The occasional musings of a mother/wife/physician/citizen of the world - it will be updated as and when inspired to do so....please keep tuning in.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Chillin'
Friday, June 24, 2011
Vacation
Sunday, June 19, 2011
Diurnal Rhythms
Saturday, June 18, 2011
Reunions
Sunday, June 12, 2011
Summer Summary
Wednesday, June 08, 2011
an alien at home
Sunday, June 05, 2011
Senior Year
Wednesday, June 01, 2011
Quilting Bee, Quilting Me







Debut
Monday, May 30, 2011
The Radical Notion that Doctors are People, Too
Friday, May 27, 2011
Upgrades
Monday, May 16, 2011
Changes
Sunday, May 01, 2011
Politics
Impressions from China - Blockage
Sunday, April 17, 2011
The Big M
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Impressions from China - Spring Fling
Friday, April 08, 2011
Ideals
THE deal is set for the Yale University and the National University of Singapore to set up a liberal arts college here ('Yale-NUS College gets faculty, alumni backing'; April 1).
But the question I want to pose is: Is it worth it?
The college will be offering a degree in liberal arts, which is not exactly a commercially viable qualification.
The fact is, to live and succeed in a competitive country like Singapore, there is more pressure on students such as myself to get a degree that will help us get a stable job, rather than something we would like to do.
The unfortunate truth is that students go to university for the degree, and not for the experience.
Also, the liberal arts 'scene' in Singapore is virtually non-existent. Students who want to actually apply what they learn in the programme will have to migrate to a country with more liberal arts opportunities, something conservative Singapore cannot provide.
Therefore, having a course that binds Western and Eastern cultures becomes moot.
Also, why not go straight to Yale, or any other university in a liberal arts savvy foreign country to study since they will have to migrate anyway? How useful will the students find this programme?"
I wonder if the author of this letter to the editor is being sarcastic or does it truly reflect the attitudes of the youth in Singapore today?
Saturday, March 26, 2011
Inside Job
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
U Turn
Concerns about over-charging highlight the need for a guide to
private doctors' fees
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Light Bulb moment

Ban ineffective screening tests
I REFER to the reply from the Ministry of Health ("Why Medisave can't be used
for all screening tests"; Thursday) to Mr Arthur Lim's letter ("Allow use of
Medisave for more screening tests"; Monday). In the name of medical ethics,
the Ministry of Health should perhaps consider a ban on tests that are of
questionable effectiveness when used as screening tools.
Going by the phenomenal growth of some medical centres, and the increasing
complexity of some packages they offer, medical providers must be doing
a roaring business.
With some packages costing as much as $9,000, could it be that a large
proportion of tests in the packages are probably not recommended as screening
tools? And if they are, why are they even allowed to be there? Shouldn't
the public be protected from such practices?
(Addendum: I am not advocating banning these tests, some of which are useful
for patients recovering from cancer, to check for recurrences. I just hope that
this is a wake up call for both patients and doctors - patients to start asking
intelligent questions about the tests & procedures which they allow themselves
to be subjected to; and doctors to stop pushing some of these health screening
packages to laymen who may have the false impression that these tests magically
detect early cancer.
Wake up, people.)