tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11620656.post2586554096472170116..comments2023-08-02T22:57:30.179+08:00Comments on The World As I Know It: Every Which Way But...Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11620656.post-43830973698016744392007-05-17T17:46:00.000+08:002007-05-17T17:46:00.000+08:00QUEEN VICTORIA.Of course! Women protect women *win...QUEEN VICTORIA.<BR/><BR/>Of course! Women protect women *wink*<BR/><BR/>No wonder lah.<BR/><BR/>And no surprises.....Prof Lee is also a woman!Dr Oz blokehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00876294124443628182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11620656.post-64997864374495629022007-05-16T21:10:00.000+08:002007-05-16T21:10:00.000+08:00Thanks for the interesting vignette abt Queen Vict...Thanks for the interesting vignette abt Queen Victoria. I'd be interested to know the real reason behind the discrepancy though...aliendochttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16943953235357596536noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11620656.post-190305207094135502007-05-15T22:42:00.000+08:002007-05-15T22:42:00.000+08:00According to Mr Wang, it's a 130 year-old law.http...According to Mr Wang, it's a 130 year-old law.<BR/><BR/>http://mrwangsaysso.blogspot.com/2007/04/lee-kuan-yew-on-homosexuality.html<BR/><BR/>And the legend is that when the anti-homosexuality law was first formulated Queen Victoria vetoed a law criminalising lesbianism because "women don't do such things". Probably false, but nevertheless interesting. :)<BR/><BR/>And yes, the law isn't about gay people, but about men performing sexual acts on/with each other. If you are gay at heart but don't have sex, that's fine. But if a hetero male engages in mutual, er, sexual acts with another hetero male because they couldn't get a date and weren't willing to pay for some, they are guilty.angry dochttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03132410467147982699noreply@blogger.com